按照近几个世纪中国人的传统审美观,林黛玉这样的弱不禁风的病态美人就是美,宝钗那样的不行,你要是手大脚大皮肤黑那就更不行了,烧火丫头的干活。虽然近代风气有点转,但骨感美也是西方的潮流。

引力是最弱的力,同时又是最不可捉摸的力。就像一个女孩,越不可捉摸越显得有吸引力,所以我说“越弱越美丽”,和林黛玉同学一样。
这两天我写暗能量的介绍,《新发现》的王艳建议了一个题目,《越暗越美丽》,我觉得有想象力。所以《越弱越暗越美丽》是王艳的版权。
引力在我们的这个世界是最弱的力,这没有疑义。几个月前Nima Arkani-Hamed, Lubos Motl, Alberto Nicolis和Cumrun Vafa写了一篇文章,猜测引力在所有可能世界中都是最弱的力。他们的论证比较复杂,后来我和宋伟以及王焘在2维世界和3维世界找到独立的证据,并且觉得如果一个引力理论降低到低维世界不是自洽的,那么它在高维中也不是自洽的。所谓引力是最弱的,也只是和其他规范长程力做对比,不涉及到例如标量场的耦合。
最近,我们在一篇新文章中考察了一个2维系统,有一个标量场和2维引力,在弱引力极限下,这个系统有孤子解,从而存在一个散射矩阵。当引力增强到一定程度时,孤子消失了,这个系统似乎不再有有质量的粒子了。在2维理论中,如果没有有质量的粒子,我们就不能构造散射矩阵,从而就不存在可观测量,我们假定此时这个引力系统已经成为不自洽的系统。我们的证明只是一个“不存在性”证明,并不严格知道引力强到什么程度这个系统变成一个不自洽系统。考虑一个简单的标量势
我们有一个结论,当
时,引力进入一个强耦合区域,林同学变成了烧火丫头。
将这个结论推广到4维,就有了一个关于标量耦合和Higgs质量的限制。
黄庆国(我的前学生,现在跑到汉城KIAS去了)和佘建黄(现学生)研究了3维的noncommutative soliton,得到相关的结论。他们的文章写好了,只是没有贴出来。我们也利用了他们的结果和简单的推广。
右派Motl第一时间对我们的工作做了报道(谢谢桑葚的通知),考虑到许多在国内的人上不了他的博客,我将他的报道转贴如下:
Weak gravity and scalars
Miao Li, Wei Song, Yushu Song, and Tower Wang propose a generalization of the weak gravity conjecture to theories with scalars: gravity should still be the weakest force, they argue using various observations. For example, they believe that in d=4, the quartic "Higgs" coupling satisfies
lambda >= (Higgsmass / Mplanck)^2
Of course, for the Standard Model, such a bound is not terribly constraining, given the huge value of Mplanck, but it is nevertheless interesting if such inequalities follow from string theory. There could exist a much more powerful generalization of all these inequalities that could play the same role for the ultimate understanding of string theory as the uncertainty principle played for quantum mechanics.
木头同学要将这些猜测变成类似量子力学中的测不准原理,如果真能做到,那就是了不起的成就了。
转发到新浪微博相关阅读:
我也学学某人,先抢个沙发。
有道理啊,怪不得所谓女强人很难找到男朋友。
Nobody:
谢谢坐沙发,这次沙发前有个大美女。
想娶奶茶:
李教授:不谢,难得的,一般情况下我连沙发的影子都见不到。:-(
快速扫了一遍您的大作。虽然还要细读才能完全看懂,但您的文章脉络真是很清晰,看着很舒服。
你目前只是计算了二维的情形吗?
两维的容易,而且仅仅是不存在证明。三维不容易,我们只能用noncommutative soliton,不是很满意。
what does gravity in 2d or 3d mean? is it dynamical?
bt:
No, it isn’t dynamical, but it destroys things when it gets too strong. We hope that this phenomenon is just a reflection of some worse situation
in 4D or even higher dimensions.
美女作比,好标题。: )
“天仙下凡”──刘立志审美系列之2:伊东美咲 Itoh Misaki
nima and vafa have been throwing various nicely packaged ideas at the audience, esp. nima seems to think people should go through radical changes of view in terms of interpreting effective field theories (although most results are well known if not stated identically). he also seems to think quantum theory should be intepretted more literally as to what one should try to predict.
to say the least, it requires a fool or a genius to fully believe the things proposed. it’s not hard to appreciate some of them and prefer them a lot compared to the landscape statistics which makes no sense for any practical question. there however seems no solid evidence. vafa and ooguri mention very crude things only as evidence in their new paper.
to formulate a theory in a (not necessarily highly) curved background based on local effective field theories with limited region of validity sounds like a natural continuation of relativity. but of course, the question is HOW.
李老师,最近没来,浏览器丢掉了bittorent的信息,改用bt。由于各种原因,不想使用实名,请您见谅。
您的文章很有启发性,瓦发的比较philosophical,看到一些实例比较有说服力。可是由于至少gauge singlet sector 在二维不会形成黑洞,瓦发等人原有的extremal黑洞argument不知道是如何modify的。
刘立志:
果然好美女!
bt:
To be honest, many of Nima’s ideas seem to come out from a-smart-than-god mind, and it is hard for me to swallow them. But this one is just a beautiful idea, as far as I can appreciate.
Before knowing how, it helps to know various limits, eventually we may be forced into a certain direction, the one pointing to the right place.
bt :
两维黑洞的存在需要2维宇宙学常数,或者如你所说,需要charge, 何况,2维黑洞,用Witten多年前的话说,is another kind of beast,举例来说,我们不知道2维黑洞与“真空”之间的关系,可不可以通过Hawking radiation连起来。
also, is it trivial that when gravity dominates, matter won’t form solitons? at least it seems obvious that when gravity dominates, matter solitons (if present) could have very trivial scattering following just kinematics.
and the potential you wrote down is not quite general? what happens with a model like sine-Gordon? not sure right now if such a model has been coupled to gravity before, but it’s reasonable. and sine-Gordon some how has a better chance of having a few solitons? of course, it doesn’t look like a model you’d get from reduciton of higher dim theories.
We discussed sine-Gordon. Of course the two examples we discussed technically just serve as examples, I believe the assertion is generally correct.
I see,sorry I missed it. it’s hard to read ps files on Mac, preview is primitive and the OSx version of ghostview not very stable. PDF is easier to handle.
the landscape is flooded with gauged sugras, no idea how one could treat them. not sure if all of them admit some extremal blackhole solutions.
bt:
我觉得如果排除landscape中的绝大部分,已经有的一点限制还远远不够。有点像将
变成
而已。
真是夜猫子啊!俺出去兜了一大圈,竟然还谈得热火朝天的。待会要做报告,要去准备了。你们继续……
李老师,string school地点就在所里吧?后天见。
地点不在所里,在研究生院的S201。
林黛玉不是美在弱不禁风
是美在弱不禁风的自有一段风流婉转态度和清灵才情
以前看到有篇文章 题为“如果你爱林黛玉 我就嫁给你”
懂得怜惜黛玉的男人至少是个怜香惜玉的男人 嘻嘻
这是我找到最满意的林黛玉的画像。
俺还是喜欢陈晓旭版的
且颇奇怪的是
昔日电视版红楼梦里的宝黛玉
在现实生活中竟与书中人的境地颇似
真的是戏如人生么?!
哦 纠正一下
是宝黛钗三人
题帕三绝
眼空蓄泪泪空垂,
暗洒线抛却为谁?
尺幅鲛绡劳解赠,
叫人焉得不伤悲!
抛珠滚玉只偷澘,
镇日无心镇日闲.
枕上袖边难拂拭,
任他点点与斑斑.
彩线难收面上珠,
湘江旧迹已模糊.
窗前亦有千竿竹,
不识香痕渍也无?
这几张图如何
http://www.yangss.com/bbs/UploadFile/2005-1/2005111013821.jpg
http://www.jiaoyou.com/attachments/2005/11/20/1561096890438077619ebbc.jpg
空对着山中高士晶莹雪,
终不忘世外仙姝寂寞林。
hehe
只看个开篇
物理的俺看不懂:(
寂寞林:
你觉得陈晓旭成了富婆的样子怎么样?
Pingback 引用通告: 博客李淼 » 不辨花丛哪瓣香
标量_张量理论,SR时空理论,芬斯勒时空中相对论,VSL理论等并触及爱因斯坦理论的核心,相对论的修正应找对突破口.
Pingback 引用通告: 博客李淼 » 拒绝完美
李老师的这张图,是带着理性的柔弱美,须知女性的美在于其温柔与不可琢磨地灵动…难于预测才让人想了解,引力弱了点,引来的力最很强大哦,呵呵
顶
额…用美人打比方是不错…
至少可以吸引目光…..
那个….不过,一个是普遍接受而且可见的…一个是科研教授主观上的…
对了,我从VSL找到这里…
请问教授对VSL可以解决的问题有什么见解?
wancongyun@sina.com